perm filename P76[HHA,LCS] blob sn#435695 filedate 1979-04-25 generic text, type C, neo UTF8
COMMENT ⊗   VALID 00003 PAGES
C REC  PAGE   DESCRIPTION
C00001 00001
C00002 00002	. DEVICE XGP    
C00004 00003	.begin verbatim
C00007 ENDMK
C⊗;
. DEVICE XGP    
.spacing 10*5 mills;
.EVERY HEADING(,{PAGE},)
.AREA TEXT LINES 4 TO 40
.FONT 1 "METL"
.font 2 "METLI"
.font 3 "METS"
.font 4 "MUS[HHA,LCS]"
.font 5 "MUZ[HHA,LCS]"
.FONT 6 "BASL35"
.PORTION MAIN;
.PLACE TEXT;
.COMPACT
.PAGE←75
.NEXT PAGE
.<< Put in a footnote. >>
.
.COUNT FOOTNOTE INLINE FROM 1 TO 999 IN PAGE PRINTING ⊂"*****"[1 TO FOOTNOTE]⊃
.<<	(IF THISDEVICE = "XGP" THEN "%51%*" ELSE "[1]");>>
.
.FOOTSEP ← "__________";
.AT "$$" ENTRY "$"
.	⊂
.	NEXT FOOTNOTE;
.	FOOTNOTE!;
.	SEND FOOT
.		⊂
.		BEGIN "NEXT FOOTNOTE"
.		SELECT 1;
.		SINGLE SPACE
.		SPACING 0 MILLS
.		INDENT 0,0,0;
.		(FOOTNOTE! & " ");
ENTRY
.		END "NEXT FOOTNOTE";
.		⊃;
.	⊃;
.
.TURN ON "%↓_↑↓[&]","α"
.begin verbatim
Example and Figure 70.  Berlioz, Fantastic Symphony 
				(Reduced from the fourth movement)
.end
.CENTER
%6⊂⊗⊃L[α%0,α%-3.75]:70X.PLT[HHA,LCS]⊂⊗⊃%1
.skip 16
.fill indent 6
	Below the main body of the analysis is shown the separate
movement of each of the two alternating progressions.  The one in ↓_g_↓ is 
quite simple; in fact, the whole g chord acts as a pedal until the
augmented sixth chord leads to the dominant.  The progression begun
by the D%4F%1 chord is listed under an ↓_A%4F%1_↓ tonic because, in view of the
ultimate hearing of the E%4F%17 (enharmonic), ↓_A%4F%1_↓ is the most direct
connecting link, even though its I chord is not used, to ↓_g_↓.  The
functions listed in parentheses might be interpreted as chromatic
elaboration of the D%4F%1 chord (see Example 67).  Thus the overall
progress from the D%4F%1 chord is likewise simple -- ↓_A%4F%1_↓: IV...V,
wherein the V serves doubly as the G6 of ↓_g_↓.  Notice that in all this
the possibility of treating the D%4F%1 chord as a %4F%1V or %4S%1IV relationship
in ↓_g_↓ is avoided.  A true direct relation of the tritone between two
tonics tends to destroy both of them.
Such a relationship would merely constitute a juxtaposition of keys
whose tonic chords were incompatible except as they both served as
subsidiaries to a third tonic (see page 46).